Embedded crypto payment infrastructure for platforms that need control
Platforms, PSPs, fintechs, and payment processors usually do not need another consumer wallet. They need payment infrastructure they can embed into their own product, control from one account, and connect to the rest of their money movement stack.
Radom is built for that use case. It supports crypto payments, billing, invoices, payment links, payouts, conversion, and payment APIs from one platform. Crypto payments can be launched with hosted checkout, embedded flows, subscriptions, invoices, payment links, and APIs. For teams that need to move funds after collection, crypto convert, virtual accounts, and mass payouts help connect acceptance to settlement and downstream operations.
"Accept crypto payments, subscriptions, invoices, payment links, and payouts from one platform."
What embedded infrastructure should cover
If you are evaluating build versus buy, the useful question is not whether a provider can process a payment. It is whether the stack can support the flows your business actually needs without forcing you to stitch together separate tools.
- Hosted checkout for fast launch.
- Embedded payment flows for product-led experiences.
- Payment links for low-code collection.
- Billing and subscriptions for recurring revenue.
- Invoices for finance-led collection.
- Payouts for affiliates, creators, contractors, sellers, and users.
- Conversion and settlement workflows for treasury and operations.
- APIs and docs for teams that need to integrate deeply.
Radom's public product pages describe these capabilities across payments, payouts, conversion, virtual accounts, and on and off ramp workflows. For developers, the docs are the right next step. Read the docs.
How a platform team can use Radom
- Choose the payment flow your users need, such as hosted checkout, payment links, invoices, or subscriptions.
- Decide where funds should land after collection, whether that is a Radom balance, a conversion step, a virtual account, or a payout workflow.
- Connect the flow through the API or no-code tools, depending on how much control your product team wants.
- Use the dashboard to track balances, settlement, and reporting.
- Expand into payouts, conversion, or account workflows as the product grows.
This matters for platforms because the payment layer is rarely isolated. A buyer may start with acceptance, then need recurring billing, then need to reconcile funds, then need to send payouts. Radom is positioned to support that broader operating loop.
Where Radom removes work
Radom reduces the number of separate systems a team needs to manage. Instead of connecting one provider for checkout, another for billing, another for payout operations, and another for conversion, teams can keep more of the workflow inside one account.
That is especially useful when your product team needs to move quickly but finance still needs clear settlement records. Radom's pricing page also frames the platform as one place for payments, billing, conversion, and settlement. See pricing.
How to compare Radom with direct integrations and other build options
When evaluating embedded payment infrastructure, compare providers on operational fit rather than marketing language.
Direct integrations
Direct integrations can work if you only need one narrow flow. They become harder to manage when you need acceptance, settlement, payouts, and reporting to live together. Check whether the provider supports the payment paths your team actually ships.
Generic crypto gateways
Some gateways are built mainly for checkout. That may be enough for a simple payment page, but it can leave gaps if you also need billing, invoicing, payout operations, or conversion workflows.
Banking or fiat-first providers
Fiat-first providers may be useful for account access and local rails, but they may not cover crypto acceptance, conversion, or direct crypto payout needs. For teams operating across crypto, stablecoins, and fiat, that gap matters.
API-first vendors and build in-house
API-first vendors can be strong when your engineering team wants deep control. Build in-house only if you are prepared to own edge cases around settlement, reconciliation, conversion, and payout handling over time.
Radom is designed for businesses that want a practical payments layer rather than a speculative crypto product. If your team is comparing options, the right test is whether the platform supports the full workflow, not just the first payment event.
Who this is for
This page is most relevant for:
- Payments teams that need embedded crypto and fiat infrastructure.
- Founders evaluating a faster path to launch.
- Finance operations teams that care about settlement and reconciliation.
- Platform operators building acceptance and payout workflows.
- Affiliate and iGaming operators that need global payout operations.
- Creator and subscription platforms that need recurring collection and settlement.
- Developers comparing payment APIs and docs-first onboarding.
Next steps
If you are deciding whether Radom fits your stack, start with the product area that matches your use case. Review crypto payments, mass payouts, virtual accounts, and crypto convert, then move to docs or contact sales for a deeper implementation conversation.
Talk to sales about white-label payment infrastructure
Frequently asked questions
Is Radom only for crypto-native businesses?+
No. Radom is positioned as financial infrastructure for businesses that need to accept, manage, and move money across crypto, stablecoins, open banking, and fiat account rails.
Can Radom support embedded checkout and no-code flows?+
Yes. The public product pages reference hosted checkout, embedded flows, payment links, invoices, subscriptions, and APIs.
Can a platform use Radom for payouts as well as collection?+
Yes. The product pages describe payouts alongside payments, billing, conversion, and settlement.
Should we use Radom if we need treasury or settlement workflows?+
Radom's product pages point to conversion, virtual accounts, and settlement tools, which may fit teams that need more than payment acceptance alone.
Where should developers start?+
Start with the docs and the product page that matches the first workflow you want to ship.
