Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Questions the Viability of Traditional Banks Creating Their Own Stablecoins, Advocates for USDC Instead

Is it feasible or beneficial for traditional banks to create their own stablecoins? According to Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, leveraging existing, widely-accepted stablecoins like USDC could hold more promise for the financial ecosystem than banks pursuing proprietary versions. Armstrong advocates for the use of established stablecoins, citing interoperability and stability as key advantages.

Magnus Oliver

May 21, 2025

Is it feasible or beneficial for traditional banks to create their own stablecoins? According to Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, leveraging existing, widely-accepted stablecoins like USDC could hold more promise for the financial ecosystem than banks pursuing proprietary versions. Armstrong advocates for the use of established stablecoins, citing interoperability and stability as key advantages.

During a recent fintech conference, Armstrong expressed concerns over the proliferation of stablecoins that could potentially arise if each traditional bank were to introduce its own digital currency. The core of his argument lies in the risk of fragmenting the landscape, which could stifle rather than stimulate innovation. "When every bank has its own stablecoin, we risk creating walled gardens that could hinder the seamless exchange of assets we see today with currencies like USDC," Armstrong remarked.

USDC, operated by the consortium CENTRE — co-founded by Coinbase and Circle — has emerged as a prominent player in the stablecoin market. It stands as a testament to successful collaboration between crypto-native companies and the traditional financial system. Armstrong details that this collaboration has led to the development of a robust infrastructure that supports USDC's usage across a multitude of platforms, both crypto and non-crypto related. This kind of interoperability is what he suggests will be vital for the long-term viability of digital currencies in mainstream finance.

Another angle Armstrong emphasized is regulatory compliance. USDC, for example, often highlights its committed adherence to regulatory standards, ensuring audited reserves and transparent operations. Launching and maintaining a stablecoin that lives up to these rigorous standards requires significant effort and resources which may be beyond what some smaller banks can manage.

Finally, the existing scale and adoption of stablecoins like USDC provide them with an extensive user base, which would be challenging for newly minted bank-specific stablecoins to match quickly. This broad adoption not only facilitates ubiquitous acceptance but also helps in maintaining price stability. In his view, it is more pragmatic for banks to collaborate with existing stablecoin providers to integrate digital currency solutions within their existing frameworks rather than reinventing the wheel.

Armstrong's statements shed light on an important debate within the financial sector regarding the future role of digital currencies. While traditional banks venturing into creating proprietary stablecoins isn't far-fetched, the cooperative route epitomized by stablecoins like USDC could pave a smoother transition into digital finance, especially under the scrutinous eyes of global regulators. As the landscape evolves, it will be interesting to see how banks choose to navigate these waters — independently or in partnership with established players in the space.

Sign up to Radom to get started