Rising Costs in Bitcoin Mining Accompany Record-breaking Hashrate Levels

As Bitcoin mining difficulty reaches unprecedented levels, miners face increasing economic challenges despite stable cryptocurrency prices, according to a recent analysis by TheMinerMag. This situation is forcing major mining companies like MARA Holdings and CleanSpark to expand their capacities, extending the payback periods on their investments to two years amidst rising operational costs.

Nathan Mercer

June 17, 2025

As Bitcoin mining difficulty sets new highs, courtesy of a record 126.98 trillion metric and a whopping 913.54 exahashes per second hash rate, the economic squeeze on miners is tightening. According to a recent analysis by TheMinerMag, even stable Bitcoin prices aren't enough to prevent the erosion of profit margins, challenging the sector's sustainability and operational strategies.

Transaction fees, historically a sweetener for miners' earnings, dipped below 1% of block rewards last month, underscoring the lean phase the industry is going through. This financial constriction comes at a time when operational costs-ranging from equipment to electricity-are on the rise. With top-tier ASICs now costing between $10 and $30 per terahash and electricity rates like those paid by Terawulf nudging upwards of $0.081 per kWh, the break-even points are drifting further away.

The direct impact of these rising costs and increased competition can be seen in the strategic shifts of publicly traded mining companies. Entities such as MARA Holdings and CleanSpark are aggressively expanding their operational capacities in a bid to amortize costs over larger production volumes. This strategic pivot is critical as payback periods on mining hardware extend to an exhausting two years, based on the optimistic assumption of a $0.06/kWh electricity rate.

Interestingly, the correlation between Bitcoin's price and mining equities is beginning to unravel. Over the past month, while players like IREN and Core Scientific have seen their stock values climb, others like Canaan and Bitfarms have witnessed declines, signaling a decoupling influenced perhaps by individual operational efficiencies and strategic moves rather than the cryptocurrency's market price alone.

This environment raises pertinent questions about the long-term viability of Bitcoin mining as a profitable endeavor, especially for smaller players who might not have the capital to scale operations or innovate in energy efficiency. As the industry evolves, the shakeout might not be brutal, but it could redefine the contours of cryptocurrency mining operations, pushing it further into the realm of big players and high stakes.

For a more detailed dive into the implications of these shifts, particularly in how they relate to broader regulatory and economic trends, consider reading our recent piece on U.S. cryptocurrency regulation which touches upon the macroeconomic pressures shaping these micro trends.

Sign up to Radom to get started