South Korea Increases Regulatory Measures on Cryptocurrency, Limiting Access Through Unregistered Exchanges on Major App Platforms

South Korea's innovative approach of utilizing app store policies, particularly through Google Play, to enforce cryptocurrency regulatory compliance marks a significant shift in the intersection of technology and regulation. This strategy not only sets a precedent for other nations considering similar measures but also poses substantial implications for global crypto exchanges seeking to operate within one of Asia's key digital markets.

Arjun Renapurkar

January 17, 2026

South Korea is setting a robust precedent in the evolving narrative of cryptocurrency regulation, imposing significant restrictions on the access and distribution of crypto apps via major app platforms. The country's recent amendments to the Capital Markets Act and the Electronic Securities Act are particularly noteworthy, as these changes institutionalize tokenized securities, integrating blockchain distinctly within the formal securities regulation framework. This effort is further complemented by Korea's unique utilization of app stores, namely Google Play, to enforce crypto regulatory compliance.

The intersection of technology and regulation is illustrated by Google Play's new policy, effective January 28, which prohibits South Korean users from downloading or updating apps associated with crypto exchanges that have not registered as virtual asset service providers with South Korea's Financial Intelligence Unit. Such a strategy, initially appearing as a corporate policy decision, intriguingly aligns with the broader regulatory direction envisioned by South Korean authorities. This is not isolated; other nations are also scrutinizing how cryptocurrencies are managed, though South Korea's approach-leveraging app store policies to enforce financial regulations-is particularly innovative.

This scenario underscores a larger trend where digital gatekeepers like app platforms are becoming inadvertent enforcers of national regulations. The implications for global exchanges are substantial, as seen with entities such as Binance, Bybit, and OKX, which find themselves sidelined in one of Asia’s most vibrant digital markets due to non-compliance with local VASP registrations. Such measures might encourage these platforms to seek compliance, or alternatively, they might recalibrate their operations to countries with more lenient regulatory frameworks.

Moreover, this regulatory evolution could inspire other jurisdictions to adopt similar enforcement strategies, potentially leading to a fragmented global marketplace where access and operations are heavily dictated by local laws. For stakeholders in the crypto space, this represents a clear signal-regulatory compliance cannot be an afterthought but is instead a prerequisite to accessing lucrative markets. This development, therefore linked to broader themes in financial technology and regulatory compliance, is covered in detail in a recent analysis by Decrypt.

As we observe these changes, the broader implications for global financial markets and the crypto ecosystem are profound. Entities operating within this space must navigate not only the technological complexities but also an increasingly intricate regulatory landscape. For more insights on navigating these regulatory frameworks, consider exploring Radom's on- and off-ramping solutions, which are designed to meet regulatory standards while facilitating efficient crypto transactions.

Sign up to Radom to get started