Toncoin's TON Value Plummets Following UAE's Rejection of 'Golden Visa' Benefits for Stakers

The recent plunge in Toncoin's value, triggered by the UAE's denial of 'Golden Visa' benefits for its stakers, underscores the fragile nexus between cryptocurrency promotions and regulatory frameworks. This debacle not only reveals the impact of high-profile miscommunications but also stresses the need for verified information and transparent dealings between the crypto community and national governments.

Ivy Tran

July 9, 2025

When Toncoin's value took a nosedive following the UAE's rejection of 'Golden Visa' benefits for its stakers, it highlighted a critical point: the volatile intersection of cryptocurrency promotions and governmental regulation. This incident, where the TON Foundation CEO Max Crown's tweet backfired, underscores not just a miscommunication but a broader, more systemic issue within the crypto community-reliability and the sources of information.

The UAE's swift response through its Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security, along with the Securities and Commodities Authority and the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority, serves as a stark reminder of the importance of verified public-private partnerships in the blockchain space. This is a lesson in the necessity of transparent, clear communication from credible sources, particularly when it involves national government collaborations. A mere tweet, as seen reported by Decrypt, is categorically insufficient to establish the credibility needed for announcements of such magnitude.

Furthermore, the rapid fluctuations in TON’s market value in reaction to both the initial tweet and the subsequent denial from the UAE signify how sensitive crypto markets remain to regulatory news. This incident isn't isolated. It reflects ongoing challenges within the crypto industry-issues like market manipulation, overreactions to unverified news, and the substantial influence of high-profile figures. It reminds investors and participants in the crypto space to maintain a critical eye and verify information through official channels before taking action.

Alexandr Kerya’s criticism about the standards of communication in crypto announcements is apt. In an era where information is instantaneous, the crypto industry must prioritize the accuracy and legitimacy of the information being disseminated. This is crucial, not just for the protection of individual investors but for the health and stability of the broader crypto market. As Kerya suggested, building a future where crypto technologies are seamlessly integrated into national systems must start with a solid foundation of trust and verified facts.

This episode also casts a spotlight on the broader implications for crypto regulation. Regulatory bodies and those within the blockchain industry must collaborate more closely to establish guidelines that support both innovation and investor protection. Such partnerships could pave the way for more structured frameworks that support the growth of cryptocurrencies while safeguarding against potential abuses and misunderstanding.

While the TON debacle may be a setback for those involved, it serves as a critical learning curve for the crypto industry to aspire towards better standards of transparency and communication. Investors, on their part, would do well to heed such incidents as cautionary tales, reminding them of the due diligence necessary before making investment decisions based on flashy announcements or the tweets of influential figures.

Sign up to Radom to get started