Traditional Financial Institutions' Liquidity Challenges Pose Underappreciated Risks for Cryptocurrency Markets

Arthur Azizov of B2 Ventures highlights the critical issue of the "liquidity mirage" in cryptocurrency markets, a phenomenon where liquidity appears abundant in calm markets but quickly evaporates during turbulence, echoing challenges long faced by traditional financial markets. This problem, exacerbated by the fragmented nature of crypto exchanges, poses significant risks during market stress, as seen in the recent collapse of Mantra’s OM token.

Magnus Oliver

June 16, 2025

Arthur Azizov, founder and investor at B2 Ventures, recently spotlighted what many in fintech and crypto are whispering about but not loudly addressing: the mirage of liquidity in cryptocurrency markets, a challenge inherited from traditional finance’s playbook. It’s an uncomfortable truth that when the markets are calm, liquidity seems boundless; come turmoil, and it vanishes like a conjurer’s trick.

This concept of liquidity isn't unique to crypto. As noted in a CoinTelegraph analysis, traditional financial markets have danced around this issue for years. The foreign exchange market, though touted as the pinnacle of liquidity, experiences jarring slippage that exposes the fragility lying beneath its vast trading volumes. Crypto, in its relative infancy, faces this on a multiplied scale, given its fragmented infrastructure across numerous exchanges and the varying liquidity they provide.

This liquidity illusion is not just a theoretical risk; it has tangible impacts during market stress. Consider the recent implosion of Mantra’s OM token where, amidst a frenzy, the bids evaporated, leaving investors grappling with steep losses. Here, the illusion of a robust order book was shattered, revealing the shallow support beneath.

The fragmented nature of crypto markets exacerbates this issue. With liquidity spread thin across various platforms, there's no unified support to stabilize token prices in times of distress. This fragmentation opens doors for manipulative practices like wash trading, further complicating the true assessment of liquidity.

So, what's the fix? Deep-rooted integration at the base protocol level may hold some answers. By weaving cross-chain bridging and liquidity functions into blockchain infrastructure, we can begin to see a more cohesive marketplace. This structural shift could buffer against liquidity shocks by ensuring more consistent availability of funds across the ecosystem.

Yet, infrastructure alone isn’t the silver bullet. As the industry evolves, a combination of regulatory oversight, technological advancement, and perhaps most critically, a shift in market participant behavior is essential. The last one is a tough nut to crack, as market behavior is often governed by short-term incentives that overlook long-term stability.

If anything, the lesson here isn’t new, but it bears repeating. Liquidity in crypto, much like in traditional finance, isn't just about having ample volume but ensuring that it's reliable in times when you need it most. It's high time the industry takes a long, hard look in the mirror and assesses whether the foundations it's building today will stand the test of not just bull runs but also the inevitable bears.

Sign up to Radom to get started