Understanding Consumer Perceptions of Credit Card Security Risks

A recent J.D. Power survey reveals a stark disconnect between consumer behavior and cybersecurity expectations, with 30% of credit card users admitting no proactive security measures taken in the past three months, despite a high preference for bank-led interventions in fraud cases. This consumer complacency not only undermines their own security but also adds significant strain on financial institutions, posing a systemic risk to global financial stability.

Nathan Mercer

November 24, 2025

Despite billions spent on cybersecurity by financial institutions, a significant chunk of their clientele seems to have missed the memo on cyber vigilance, according to a recent J.D. Power survey. The findings expose a troubling laissez-faire attitude among consumers regarding credit card security, with a stark 30% admitting to taking no proactive security measures in the past three months. This lack of consumer engagement poses not just a personal risk but a systemic one, amplifying the potential for financial fraud which, as per a Nilson Report, could snowball to a staggering $403.88 billion globally over the decade.

It’s noteworthy that while nearly a quarter of the surveyed consumers experienced credit card fraud last year, the demographic breakdown reveals younger and economically stressed consumers as the most affected. Particularly alarming is the 41% victim rate among Gen Z users, a group that ironically is presumed to be more tech-savvy and security-conscious. This juxtaposition underscores a possible gap in the perception versus the reality of digital security savviness, or perhaps, a higher exposure to risk-prone online environments.

The survey further highlights a disconnect between what consumers expect and what they practice. While a hefty 69% prefer bank interventions when fraud is suspected, only 18% have bothered updating their account passwords recently. This gap between expectation for security and personal action towards it doesn't just undermine individual security but also places an undue burden on financial institutions.

For a more practical perspective, consider the implications for companies managing high-volume transactions, such as those in affiliate networks or iGaming. For firms in these sectors, robust security measures are not just beneficial, but essential. Understanding the significance of this, Radom offers tailored security solutions that cater specifically to the unique needs of these industries. Similarly, for businesses considering enhancing their payment infrastructures, Radom’s on-and off-ramping solutions provide a secure bridge between crypto and fiat systems, mitigating risks associated with both realms.

In light of the staggering potential losses highlighted by the FTC, reaching possibly $158 billion due to underreporting, the data is a cold splash of reality on the face of consumer complacency. Financial institutions and consumers alike must step up their game, leveraging available tools and resources to fortify their defenses against a tide of ever-evolving threats. For consumers, this might be a good time to explore the security tools offered by their financial institutions, and perhaps, finally take that much-postponed step of updating their passwords.

As Jennifer White, the senior director for banking and payments intelligence at J.D. Power, aptly puts it, the onus isn't just on the banks. The frontline of defense in digital finance often starts with the consumer. A lesson seemingly simple, yet evidently hard to imbibe.

Sign up to Radom to get started